Economic Boycotts

In the crisis following the tragic events of September
11th, President Bush appealed to the American people to show
their patriotism by spending, by fueling a sagging economy with
dollars. Though it has been a long time since I worked as an economist,
some old imprints must have surfaced from the rusty archives
of my memory. Over lunch one day, I said to a friend,
"If we can help this country by infusing the market place
with money, then we can also choose which sectors of the economy
we wish to support and which we choose not to favor with our
spending. Never in recent memory has there been a more important
time to express one's vision of the future than now.
As my own active mind raced hither and thither,
I began to think of what I hoped would form a part of the future:
organic food, safe medicine, non-polluting energy, and educational
systems and institutions that help each individual to discover
his or her contract with God to fulfill a purpose on Earth. I
had never felt so fertile or creative as an economist, and I
really wanted to inspire others to see the potential of a completely
different
"multiplier effect." In classical economics, we trace
the movement of a dollar through many hands and watch how it
stimulates one sector of the economy after another. In conscious
economics, we can choose to use our earnings to "sponsor" that
which we wish to see thrive.
So, on the positive side, I saw how consumption
of organic food and medicine would operate against the megalomaniacal
aspirations of Archer Daniel Midlands and Monsanto and perhaps
arrest the infiltration of genetically modified food and medicine
into our culture and DNA. Without pounding the streets with banners
and slogans, one can simply talk to one's friends and neighbors
and encourage conscious consumption. This site is new and the
suggestions that are posted represent an embryonic effort to
inspire and encourage consumer activism. It will grow and you
can click on the subscribe button
to be notified when there are new posts.
State
Farm Insurance
State Farm Insurance has denied countless claims
for wind damage in areas of the Bayou devastated by hurricanes. It
has accomplished this inhumanity against legitimately insured
customers by falsifying engineering reports, forging signatures,
and systematic corporate abuse of power. Show your
support for your dislocated brothers and sisters by boycotting
State Farm.
Aspartame
Although Monsanto denies the chemical's toxicity,
80-85% of consumer complaints to the FDA about food pertain
to Aspartame. Symptoms vary enormously: muscle and joint pain,
menstrual cramps, ringing in ears, vertigo, nausea, insomnia,
severe headaches, blurred vision and slurred speech, memory
loss, blindness, mild to seriously suicidal depression, and
seizures.
Exxon-Mobil
and Chevron-Texaco
For more than half a century, the world has understood
the problems related to air pollution and diminishing resources.
During at least the last 20-30 years, alternatives to fossil
fuels have been developed, but multinational corporations and
their cohorts in government have failed to implement policies
allowing for a smooth transition from obsolete technologies
to modern methods for producing the energy that sustains the
modern world . . . and now we at war for oil.
Round
Up
In 1997, Monsanto lost a lawsuit and agreed
to stop using the terms "bio-degradable"
and "environmentally friendly" in its advertising.
The primary byproduct of herbicide manufacture is dioxin,
a chemical described by some as the most toxic on the Planet.
It has been implicated in any number of issues from Agent
Orange to the Love Canal.
Junk
Science
While, in the past, companies have created fake
citizens' groups to campaign in favour of trashing forests
or polluting rivers, now they create fake citizens. Messages
purporting to come from disinterested punters are planted on
listservers at critical moments, disseminating misleading information
in the hope of recruiting real people to the cause. Detective
work by the campaigner Jonathan Matthews and the freelance
journalist Andy Rowell shows how a PR firm contracted to the
biotech company Monsanto appears to have played a crucial but
invisible role in shaping scientific discourse.
.
More on boycotts:
http://www.solari.com/
|